[iset] hello world

[Julian Rohrhuber]

this is a very nice game. we've done some code cadavre exquis 
variants in SC before, which worked a bit like this, but something 
peculiar was obviously missing.

So I have the next instruction set suggestion for September:
Looking at someone looking at someone is interesting. Write some code 
where some part of the program is looking at another part of the 
program. Or extend a program by a program that is looking at a part 
of it. Listening is allowed, too.


>Has anyone played a game of "processing tennis" before?
>
>You know, in this tradition:
><http://www.flickr.com/groups/pstennis/discuss/72157594587584774/>http://www.flickr.com/groups/pstennis/discuss/72157594587584774/
><http://layertennis.com/071026/02.php>http://layertennis.com/071026/02.php
>
>If anyone is up for a game, they could use my little sketch as a 
>jumping-off-point:
><http://notlime.com/2008/processing/iconic_growing_triangles/>http://notlime.com/2008/processing/iconic_growing_triangles/
>
>--Mark
>
>On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:10 AM, James Sheridan 
><<mailto:james.sheridan at anu.edu.au>james.sheridan at anu.edu.au> wrote:
>
>
>I reckon a competition, not need for prizes just some kudos for whoever
>puts in the most work or has the cleverest idea
>
>
>
>
>
>Dave Griffiths wrote:
>>>  On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 17:23 +0200, e m o c wrote:
>>>>  Anybody in there ?
>>>>  Instructionset.org is a great/fun idea, I enjoyed contributing for the
>>>>  time
>>>>  today!
>>>  Hey Emoc,
>>>
>>>  Nice contributions :)
>>>
>>>  I'm just back from two weeks away...  Instructionset needs a new
>>>  instruction for us all to follow -- anyone got a good idea?
>>>
>>>  Also if anyone has got thoughts about how instructionset could be
>>>  improved, I'd love to hear them.  The first instruction has a lot of
>>>  code entries, but the ones since have not had such a big response.
>>>  Anyone got a thought about why that might be?
>>
>>  Well as someone who only contributed to the first one, I think one idea
>>  might be to make them time limited - so that you can only contribute a
>>  program to the latest instruction. A sense of urgency might stop me keep
>>  putting it off at least :)
>>
>>  cheers,
>>
>>  dave
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  iset mailing list
>>  <mailto:iset at lurk.org>iset at lurk.org
>> 
>><http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset>http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset
>
>_______________________________________________
>iset mailing list
><mailto:iset at lurk.org>iset at lurk.org
><http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset>http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>iset mailing list
>iset at lurk.org
>http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset


-- 





.