[iset] hello world

[Dave Griffiths]

This sort of thing also happens a lot in the indy games scene too, here's
quite a good example I saw yesterday:
http://www.yakyak.org/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=72929

> this is a very nice game. we've done some code cadavre exquis
> variants in SC before, which worked a bit like this, but something
> peculiar was obviously missing.
>
> So I have the next instruction set suggestion for September:
> Looking at someone looking at someone is interesting. Write some code
> where some part of the program is looking at another part of the
> program. Or extend a program by a program that is looking at a part
> of it. Listening is allowed, too.
>
>
>>Has anyone played a game of "processing tennis" before?
>>
>>You know, in this tradition:
>><http://www.flickr.com/groups/pstennis/discuss/72157594587584774/>http://www.flickr.com/groups/pstennis/discuss/72157594587584774/
>><http://layertennis.com/071026/02.php>http://layertennis.com/071026/02.php
>>
>>If anyone is up for a game, they could use my little sketch as a
>>jumping-off-point:
>><http://notlime.com/2008/processing/iconic_growing_triangles/>http://notlime.com/2008/processing/iconic_growing_triangles/
>>
>>--Mark
>>
>>On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:10 AM, James Sheridan
>><<mailto:james.sheridan at anu.edu.au>james.sheridan at anu.edu.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>I reckon a competition, not need for prizes just some kudos for whoever
>>puts in the most work or has the cleverest idea
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Dave Griffiths wrote:
>>>>  On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 17:23 +0200, e m o c wrote:
>>>>>  Anybody in there ?
>>>>>  Instructionset.org is a great/fun idea, I enjoyed contributing for
>>>>> the
>>>>>  time
>>>>>  today!
>>>>  Hey Emoc,
>>>>
>>>>  Nice contributions :)
>>>>
>>>>  I'm just back from two weeks away...  Instructionset needs a new
>>>>  instruction for us all to follow -- anyone got a good idea?
>>>>
>>>>  Also if anyone has got thoughts about how instructionset could be
>>>>  improved, I'd love to hear them.  The first instruction has a lot of
>>>>  code entries, but the ones since have not had such a big response.
>>>>  Anyone got a thought about why that might be?
>>>
>>>  Well as someone who only contributed to the first one, I think one
>>> idea
>>>  might be to make them time limited - so that you can only contribute a
>>>  program to the latest instruction. A sense of urgency might stop me
>>> keep
>>>  putting it off at least :)
>>>
>>>  cheers,
>>>
>>>  dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  iset mailing list
>>>  <mailto:iset at lurk.org>iset at lurk.org
>>>
>>><http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset>http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>iset mailing list
>><mailto:iset at lurk.org>iset at lurk.org
>><http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset>http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>iset mailing list
>>iset at lurk.org
>>http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> .
> _______________________________________________
> iset mailing list
> iset at lurk.org
> http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/iset
>